tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9396860.post110251227819790002..comments2024-03-10T20:40:17.467-04:00Comments on <center> Ralph the Sacred River </center>: Targum Neofiti, Ex. 16:15: a questionEdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05188482189638751204noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9396860.post-1102544120344161622004-12-08T17:15:00.000-05:002004-12-08T17:15:00.000-05:00I like your suggestion. The lack of textual suppo...I like your suggestion. The lack of textual support would be more weighty if your conjecture were farther out. It makes a lot more sense than the alternatives.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9396860.post-1102524910740907742004-12-08T11:55:00.000-05:002004-12-08T11:55:00.000-05:00I have Sperber's Targum Onkelos- At v. 15 Moshe is...I have Sperber's Targum Onkelos- At v. 15 Moshe is followed by the preposition- lamed (sorry, I can't type hebrew here- I don't know how). It seems that to have support your reading (emendation) would require waw, or else it is simply speculation with no basis in the text. To be sure, it makes sense! But, without some textual support I fear you will only be excoriated.Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16698562143972216357noreply@blogger.com